WFIC Diary Day 3: Data Industry Begs for Change
![bridge-goldengate bridge-goldengate](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/335/142335/bridge-goldengate-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=1Bm361al)
On the final day of industry association FISD's World Financial Information Conference, panelists stressed the need to adapt, whether in preparation for regulation, or in response to new technologies on the horizon, or to respond to competitive pressures.
A prime area for change is data usage and distribution policies, as end-users expressed frustration at still having the same discussions about this topic, and urged exchanges to look beyond counting usage by individual users and to adopt more consistent auditing standards to ease the administrative burden of subscribing to exchange market data.
A speaker from one investment bank even went so far as to say that exchanges seemingly do all they can to encourage firms to trade on their platforms, while doing all they can on the data side to discourage customers from using their data.
Exchange representatives acknowledged the challenge, noting that policy changes always lag behind advances in technology, and that exchanges are reacting to the new and different ways data is being used-for example, by offering more flexible pricing models.
However, end-users said that the administrative burden arises from the complexity of managing different pricing models from multiple exchanges, and the lack of consistent auditing requirements may mean that banks develop inventory management systems geared towards the strictest rules to ensure compliance across the board, and therefore overpay some exchanges.
To help ease the burden, end-users called for exchanges to develop a universal standard so that a firm can undergo a single audit that encompasses all exchanges, though an exchange executive noted that the different policies adopted by exchanges reflect their individual business strategies, adding that it would be a challenge to have all exchanges agree to a single standard.
Though this debate seems to remain at an impasse, other panelists continue to assert that the industry must focus on adapting to meet new challenges and deliver value. One consultant said that for a data vendor to have a viable profit model, it must deliver unique content, such as proprietary news or indexes, and unique capabilities, such as visualization tools to assimilate data quickly.
A speaker the previous day had said that industry must innovate to avoid becoming the frog that allows itself to slowly boil to death in a pot of water, and a panelist from a data provider today noted that the music industry had initially feared Napster, before recognizing it as a cry for help from consumers. Once the music industry adapted itself to serve consumers' needs, it has continued to thrive, and it is time for the data industry to do the same, the panelist said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
The IMD Wrap: Quality drivers—the sticks and carrots accelerating the data quality race
Like a Formula One Grand Prix, data management is a race that can be won or lost. And just as each race is part of a larger F1 championship that pays large sums of TV money to the winning team, winning or losing one race can contribute to winning or losing an endgame with much more at stake.
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
$135.6m fines prompt Citi to modernize infrastructure, controls
The bank was hit with a combined $135.6 million fine on Wednesday for failing to resolve “longstanding internal controls and risk issues,” amid continued internal work across the enterprise.
SocGen pushes data, analytics use cases for SG Markets
The bank is letting a handful of clients experiment with its proprietary data and models to inform their research.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
The IMD Wrap: It’s the data, Cupid!
As BlackRock buys Preqin, and LSEG strikes a data deal with Dow Jones, Max notes that in data, strange bedfellows breed valuable offspring.
This Week: BlackRock/Preqin, Trading Technologies, FIA Tech and more
A summary of some of the past week’s financial technology news.