Risk Management special report
Click here to download the PDF
Once Bitten...
One would hope that the maxim, "Once bitten, twice shy," could be used to appropriately describe the financial services industry in a post-financial-crisis dispensation, characterized by enlightenment, prudence, and dare I say it, even a modicum of humility. Only time will tell.
In many respects, risk management practices across the financial services industry were a ticking time bomb leading up to the financial crisis of 2008. While all market participants had at least some degree of risk management framework in place, what transpired in the wake of Bear Stearns' and Lehman Brothers' failures-the two highest profile bank collapses that contributed in no small way to the global credit crisis and the chain of financial and psychological events that ultimately dragged the world's economy to the very brink of complete meltdown-was, once the dust had settled, a return to the risk management drawing board where any and all financial services firms scrutinized their processes and procedures, and questioned their assumptions and models to ensure that if and when another similar event occurred, they would be better prepared to deal with the contagion.
Leading up to the financial crisis, all but the most sophisticated risk management practices were backward-looking and were invariably run on an overnight basis, given the complexity of the calculations and the computing resources needed to run measures such as Monte Carlo simulations and stress-tests. Needless to say, real-time risk management or even intra-day risk snapshots, generating enterprise-wide risk "maps," and managing counterparty credit risk on an ongoing basis during the course of the trading day, were, until recently, pipe dreams for all but the very largest sell-side firms with the deepest budgetary pockets. And, while those scenarios might still ring true for some of the industry's laggards, it's fair to say that the 2008 clarion has been well and truly heeded.
In the virtual roundtable section of this special report, which starts on page four, participants look at the extent to which buy-side and sell-side firms have embraced the move to managing their various exposures on a real-time basis; the technical, operational, and, in certain cases, the cultural challenges that need to be addressed before firms are in a position to monitor their risk on a real-time or intra-day basis; and the pivotal role that data plays in their risk management endeavors, along with the associated challenges around ensuring its cleanliness, reliability, uniformity, and the ease with which it can be shared across the enterprise. Only once these questions have been satisfied can the real-time risk management label be considered meaningful.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Artificial intelligence, like a CDO, needs to learn from its mistakes
The IMD Wrap: The value of good data professionals isn’t how many things they’ve got right, says Max Bowie, but how many things they got wrong and then fixed.
Symphony looks to cloud, AI for enhanced trader voice
The communication and collaboration platform provider is utilizing modern technology to grow its network of services and users.
Observations and lessons to learn from the move to T+1
The next few years will see other jurisdictions around the world look to North America for guidance on transitioning to shorter settlement cycles.
As US options market continued its inexorable climb, ‘plumbing’ issues persisted
Capacity concerns have lingered in the options market, but progress was made in 2024.
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.