July 2014: Beware the Snake Oil Salesman
While preparing for an upcoming investment book of record (IBOR) webcast recently, I was chatting with the CIO of a large New York-based buy-side firm about his experiences to date with what is undoubtedly the hottest topic on the buy side at the moment, even though some might describe it as over-hyped. He explained that he had been intimately involved with the extensive and laborious ground work that his firm had conducted in preparation for the long haul toward its ultimate goal of producing accurate, transparent and reliable start-of-day and intra-day positions for its small army of portfolio managers and traders, with the view to enhancing their ability to make more judicious investment decisions on behalf of their clients. He explained that while technology plays a crucial and undeniable role in allowing the firm to convert theory into practice, it’s also important to acknowledge that for complex and often protracted projects like those that typically involve the development of an IBOR, third-party vendor-provided, off-the-shelf solutions that can be implemented “out-of-the-box” simply do not exist, and that any vendor making such claims should be treated with same skepticism as a snake oil salesman.
One would assume that anyone who has risen to the helm of their firm’s technology hierarchy would be well-versed in dealing with the myriad vendors serving the capital markets, evaluating their wares, and possessing a “BS” radar sensitive enough to discern practical advice from spurious claims. But, given that the above scenario is a recurring theme with many of the CIOs I have spoken to over the years, it appears that not all technology heads have developed this ability.
For a financial technology publication like Waters that has close ties with the third-party vendor community, this sentiment might sound like heresy. But as far as I am aware, the publication, launched over two decades ago, has never espoused the view that technology alone is the panacea for all maladies. What we do focus on, however, is the importance for vendors to genuinely understand the nature of their client’s business, the extent and the vagaries of the technology and operational challenges they face, the client’s desired end-goal, and perhaps most importantly, the collaborative and consultative approach to arriving at that destination, which involves no small amount of hand-holding well after the contracts have been inked. Any vendor that does not understand that it’s not just about the technology, is no more useful in the long run than a purveyor of snake oil, and should be dealt with accordingly.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Nasdaq to market new options strike listing tech to other exchanges
The exchange operator is experimenting with emerging technologies to determine which options strike prices belong in a crowded market, with hopes to sell the tech to its peers.
The IMD Wrap: Talk about ‘live’ data, NAFIS 2024 is here
This year’s North American Financial Information Summit takes place this week, with an expanded agenda. Max highlights some of the must-attend sessions and new topics. But first, a history lesson...
MarketAxess builds strategy around X-Pro
MarketAxess profits were down in Q1, but revenues were up and automation volume hit a record $94 billion.
Canada’s triparty repo launch aims to fill C$60bn void
Test trades on TMX/Clearstream platform represent “quantum leap” for creaking funding markets.
People Moves: NorQuant, Tradition, Duco, HKEx, SimCorp, Hazeltree, Xceptor, Broadridge, and more
A look at the past month’s people moves in the capital markets technology and data space.
Bank-led consortium takes aim at position reporting
Five banks, including Barclays, BNP Paribas, Goldman Sachs and HSBC, have joined forces to mitigate interpretation and implementation errors in position reporting disclosures.
This Week: BBH, AllianceBernstein add data solutions, Deutsche Börse-Nodal Exchange, and more
A summary of some of the latest financial technology news.
Consortium backs BGC’s effort to challenge CME
Banks and market makers—including BofA, Citi, Goldman, Jump and Tower—will have a 26% stake in FMX.
Most read
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: Bloomberg’s Tony McManus
- IMD & IRD Awards 2024: All the winners
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: S&P’s CTO on AI, data, and the future of datacenters