Three Trading Venues, Three Different Approaches
IEX, NFX and Seed CX have taken different paths to reach where they are today.
IEX, Nasdaq Futures (NFX) and Seed Commodities Exchange (Seed CX) would seem, on paper, to be three vastly different trading venues.
There is IEX, which went live last week as the 13th US stock exchange after gaining approval from the US Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) back in June. There has been no shortage of stories written about the firm made famous by Michael Lewis' best-selling book "Flash Boys."
Then there is NFX, which celebrated its one-year anniversary this July. The Nasdaq-backed energy exchange is averaging 4 percent market share across crude oil, natural gas, refined products and US power and is looking to hit 10 percent by this time next year.
Finally, there is Seed CX, the newest Swap Execution Facility (SEF) to gain registration from the US Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). While most would agree there are already plenty of registered SEFs currently running—Seed CX is the 23rd—this one is a bit different. Edward Woodford, the firm's CEO and co-founder, said in a statement Seed CX's first product will be industry hemp derivatives.
Similarities in Differences
So what do a stock exchange, a futures exchange and a SEF have in common? A major foundation point of all three venues is disruption.
IEX was founded around the concept that the way the markets are run is not fair. In order to implement change, the exchange created a speed bump that fundamentally changes the way trading is done.
Anthony Malakian, WatersTechnology US editor, and I spoke on our podcast, the Waters Wavelength, about how the success or failure of IEX will have a major impact going forward on how the equities market is structured. That's only the case because of IEX's decision to install a speed bump.
NFX's form of disruption is a bit more normal, but still impactful. Looking to pounce on what it believes is a market that needs competition, NFX charges customers $0.25 when they trade and clear oil, refined and natural gas through the exchange and $1.00 on power contracts. This is significantly less than the average rate per contract of the two incumbents in the space, CME Group ($1.168) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) ($1.36).
I spoke to Magnus Haglind, the former CEO of NFX and the current deputy head of global commodities at Nasdaq, who said that while contracts will eventually go up, they will top out at 50 percent of what CME and ICE are charging.
Seed CX is quite possibly the most interesting of the bunch. The SEF space has long been considered overpopulated, but what this latest venue brings to the group is an entirely new product. Seed CX's focus is on emerging agricultural markets. Its first will be hemp, a product not to be confused with marijuana. Hemp contains less than 0.3 percent of THC, the primary psychoactive component of marijuana.
Future
All three trading venues are in the very early stages of their existence. However, the success of each will be a telling indication of where the markets are headed. Consider each a canary in the mine shaft that is the capital markets.
Substantial success by IEX will show that there is indeed a belief by those in the space that the markets need to adapt and evolve. Continued growth by NFX, as long as it can maintain its low fees, will show that firms don't have any allegiance to CME and ICE as long as they continue to have higher fees. And trading on Seed CX will show there is a true interest in non-traditional agricultural products.
It may take years for us to get a true understanding of how impactful these three firms actually are, but it will be interesting to see how things shake out.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project