ASIC Tightens Automated Trading Controls
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has published its latest report on market structure, in which it has proposed enhanced oversight for automated trading strategies.
Market participants utilizing automated functions in trading will now be required to maintain pre-trade filters, as well as the ability to suspend or limit as required. They will also be mandated to hold increased control over their order entry systems, and to submit their systems for review at least annually.
ASIC expects the new rules to cost current participants for compliance, although it does mention that many firms already have similar processes in place. The rules have come on the back of a disaster at US broker Knight Capital several weeks ago, in which an abberant algorithm lost the company $440 million in a day, requiring it to be bailed out by a consortium of other brokers and market-makers.
"Recent events overseas are a reminder of the speed and automation of markets and the importance of robust controls over those systems," says Belinda Gibson, deputy chair at ASIC. "The enhancements to participant-level controls that ASIC has released for consultation, together with the market-level controls released in June will build confidence in the integrity and cleanliness of our capital markets and facilitate international capital flows. The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern. The measures we are proposing will strengthen our protection against the type of disruption we have seen recently in other markets."
The new proposals have been foreshadowed since June 2012, when the regulator published Consultation Paper 179. The new paper, 184, titled Australian market structure: Draft market integrity rules and guidance on automated trading, further extends previous mentions and opens the text to comment from market participants until September 2012.
The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern.
ASIC's review process has been held in tandem with the liberalization of its securities markets. Traditionally dominated by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), Chi-X Australia was allowed to launch as a competitor last year, prompting a rise in the use of electronic strategies such as those involving the use of algorithms and high-frequency trading.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
GenAI: US Fed reveals its five use cases
Internal sandbox used to assess viability and risks; coding and content generation on the agenda.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher