ASIC Tightens Automated Trading Controls
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has published its latest report on market structure, in which it has proposed enhanced oversight for automated trading strategies.
Market participants utilizing automated functions in trading will now be required to maintain pre-trade filters, as well as the ability to suspend or limit as required. They will also be mandated to hold increased control over their order entry systems, and to submit their systems for review at least annually.
ASIC expects the new rules to cost current participants for compliance, although it does mention that many firms already have similar processes in place. The rules have come on the back of a disaster at US broker Knight Capital several weeks ago, in which an abberant algorithm lost the company $440 million in a day, requiring it to be bailed out by a consortium of other brokers and market-makers.
"Recent events overseas are a reminder of the speed and automation of markets and the importance of robust controls over those systems," says Belinda Gibson, deputy chair at ASIC. "The enhancements to participant-level controls that ASIC has released for consultation, together with the market-level controls released in June will build confidence in the integrity and cleanliness of our capital markets and facilitate international capital flows. The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern. The measures we are proposing will strengthen our protection against the type of disruption we have seen recently in other markets."
The new proposals have been foreshadowed since June 2012, when the regulator published Consultation Paper 179. The new paper, 184, titled Australian market structure: Draft market integrity rules and guidance on automated trading, further extends previous mentions and opens the text to comment from market participants until September 2012.
The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern.
ASIC's review process has been held in tandem with the liberalization of its securities markets. Traditionally dominated by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), Chi-X Australia was allowed to launch as a competitor last year, prompting a rise in the use of electronic strategies such as those involving the use of algorithms and high-frequency trading.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Observations and lessons to learn from the move to T+1
The next few years will see other jurisdictions around the world look to North America for guidance on transitioning to shorter settlement cycles.
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
In 2025, keep reference data weird
The SEC, ESMA, CFTC and other acronyms provided the drama in reference data this year, including in crypto.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 299: ACA Group’s Carlo di Florio
Carlo di Florio joins the podcast to discuss regulations.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
FCA to publish bond tape tender details by end of January
Market participants must wait a month longer than expected for the regulator’s draft tender document, which will see several bidders vie for the chance to build the UK’s long-awaited consolidated tape for bonds.
Too ’Berg to fail? What October’s Instant Bloomberg outage means for the industry
The ubiquitous communications platform is vital for traders around the globe, especially in fixed income and exotic derivatives. When it fails, the disruption can be great.