Verdict Reversed in Goldman HFT Code Theft Case
![washington-dc washington-dc](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/670/182670/washington-dc-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=YDcWrSoQ)
The US Second Circuit Court of Appeals has found that two key pieces of legislation do not adequately cover the theft of source code from Goldman Sachs’ high-frequency trading (HFT) engine in 2009 by a former employee.
In a unanimous opinion, the appeals court ruled that the transmission of Goldman's proprietary code by Sergey Aleynikov, a programmer at the bank, did not constitute a criminal offence by the definitions of the statutes used to bring charges. His prior conviction by a district court and subsequent imprisonment was reversed as a result.
Specifically, the lack of a tangible product removed from Goldman Sachs by Aleynikov, who uploaded significant portions of the code to a German server shortly before leaving the firm, could not come under the provisions of the National Stolen Property Act (NSPA). The law makes it a criminal offence to knowingly transport stolen goods, but as the code was not a physical asset, it could not be defined as such in a legal framework. Although Aleynikov, who left Goldman to take on a lead role at Chicago-based Teza Technology with the specific aim of building an HFT engine, later allegedly transported the code on flash drives, this also did not come under the remit of the law. The transfer of an intangible property to a tangible medium, said the ruling, did not transform the good itself into stolen property.
The second charge, relating to the Economic Espionage Act (EEA), was also dismissed by the court as being insufficient as a matter of law. As Goldman's HFT engine was proprietary in nature, and the firm had no visible intention of placing it into the marketplace, or making a product derived from it to do so, the court ruled, it did not constitute an offense under the EEA.
A third charge, that Aleynikov exceeded his authority by accessing the source code, was struck down on the grounds that his level of privilege adequately covered his activities in this regard.
The key aspect of the ruling was the ephemeral nature of the digital product, as opposed to anything that could be readily identified as a tangible good stolen from Goldman under the provisions of the statutes invoked. In summary, the court said that it would decline to "stretch or update statutory words of plain and ordinary meaning in order to better accommodate the digital age."
While Aleynikov's actions, in the appeal court's ruling, did not constitute a criminal offense, he could be liable for civil action depending on the circumstances of the case.
SST Analysis
The ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, while correct in the literal interpretation of the law and prior cases, raises questions about the ability of legislation to keep up with technological development.
In particular, the increasingly electronic nature of trading makes it difficult to identify physical assets, which the legal framework of federal crimes such as this are built around. If cases such as this continue to occur, as seems likely, the importance of technical innovation in financial services and other sectors could force a legal review.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher
Hong Kong looks for digital response to trade reporting burden
New swaps reporting framework will include more fields than requirements in US or Singapore.
Big questions remain over Dora’s critical third parties
Industry looks for clarity on critical third parties ahead of July 17 regulatory technical standards for the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act.
As legal letters fly, Cusip licensing debate rolls on
Cusip Global Services’ licensing agreements with third-party data providers sit at the heart of the antitrust case against itself and three others.
Most read
- IEX Cloud closure forces fintech clients to seek data alternatives
- Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
- The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options