Citi Settles $15 Million Penalty With SEC Over Compliance, Surveillance Failures
Citi failed to properly review thousands of trades executed by several of its trading desks during a 10-year period.

"Today's high-speed markets require that broker-dealers and investment advisers manage the convergence of technology and compliance," said Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC's division of enforcement, in a statement. "Firms must ensure that they have devoted sufficient attention and resources to trade surveillance and other compliance systems."
The New York-based bank agreed to pay a $15 million penalty.
The SEC investigation found Citi failed to review thousands of trades executed by some of its trading desks over a 10-year period. While Citi employees reviewed electronically generated reports of trades on a daily basis, technological errors meant the reports omitted several sources of information about thousands of trades.
The investigation found that Citi's failures occurred from 2002 to 2012. The bank also inadvertently routed more than 467,000 transactions on behalf of advisory clients to an affiliated market marker, which executed the transactions on a principal basis via buying or selling to the clients from its own account.
The SEC found Citi's policies and procedures to avoid these types of occurrences to not be reasonably designed or implemented. The investigation also said Citi's trade surveillance failed to detect the principal transactions for more than two years due to the bank relying upon a report that wasn't designed to capture principal transactions executed through the affiliate.
The bank voluntarily paid $2.5 million, the total profits from the principal transactions, to the affected advisory client accounts. Citi also agreed to retain a consultant to review and recommend improvements to its trade surveillance and advisory account order handling and routing.
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.