One Chain to Rule Them All?
Industry experts weigh in on how many blockchains are needed in the industry.
![blockchain-technology blockchain-technology](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/163/347163/blockchain-technology.jpeg.webp?h=1ce68bf4&itok=1Yd7ZLel)
When the dust finally settles on industry adoption of distributed-ledger technologies, how many ledgers will exist? It’s a question that’s had an evolving answer over the past few years as industry folks continue to gain a better understanding of how the complex technology works.
The word “industry standard” gets thrown around a lot when anyone talks about their offering, but when it comes to things like the Utility Settlement Coin (USC), a digital currency used to clear and settle trades being developed by a group of banks and other financial services firms, it would seem like it might be counterintuitive to have several iterations of the same type of project going around.
Leda Glyptis, a director at Sapient Global Markets who previously ran BNY Mellon’s EMEA innovation center and was involved in the bank’s initial talks around joining the USC project, says a year ago the common belief in the space was that industry standards needed to exist. Firms needed to agree on the right fabric and plumbing to ensure an ideal setup. One year and several working groups later that sentiment has changed slightly, according to Glyptis.
“Will there be one blockchain to rule them all in terms of the planning? Ideally, quite a lot of people are spending toward that,” Glyptis says. “We’re seeing more and more exceptionally smart people who do this for a living saying you don’t have to have one—you just have to have that interoperability.”
Several Chains
When the dust finally settles on industry adoption of distributed-ledger technologies, how many ledgers will exist?
Peter Randall, CEO of blockchain settlement and payments provider SETL, takes a harder line on the topic. He says the industry is not moving toward one “pan-galactic blockchain.” Instead, he says, institutions and jurisdictions will have their own blockchains with the key being the ability for those different chains to talk to each other.
Randall uses the variety of mobile phone networks currently available as an example of how the industry will work. Just because one person uses Verizon and another uses AT&T doesn’t mean they won’t be able to speak to each other. He admits that there is a tipping point before the space becomes too saturated, but says there will never be only one chain.
“Anybody who suggests that there should be one great big chain is bonkers,” Randall says. “That’s not the way it works.”
More to Learn
Saket Sharma, CIO of treasury services at BNY Mellon, one of the firms involved in the USC, says it’s too early to say definitively that only one chain should exist. The technology is not yet mature enough for proponents to make that decision. For the time being, the more people working on it the better, Sharma says.
“You don’t want to hinder the innovation that’s happening across the board. We don’t know what the end goal is going to look like at this point,” Sharma says. “I think it’s good to have people explore it, because we don’t know where it’s going to land.”
Edward Budd, chief digital officer of global transaction banking at Deutsche Bank, which is also involved in the USC, echoed Sharma’s sentiments. The industry will benefit from firms working on small, practical situations and tests to better understand the interoperability between the different ways that the technology can be executed, he says.
However, as use-cases become clearer, things will start to settle down, according to Budd.
“I think it needs slightly more maturity in what’s being proposed, and that’s why we see there only really being some very niche examples of this that really get brought into production. Nevertheless, some will make it into production in the next six to 12 months,” Budd says. “How I see it at the moment is that those will start to give more practical information about how and what is necessary to interoperate and which flavors match which markets best.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Facing platform shutdown, former IEX Cloud head buys its assets in 11th-hour bid
Tim Baker, Pedro Aguayo, and a silent partner have come together to purchase IEX Cloud’s assets days before the exchange was to retire all its products on August 31.
Recent volatility highlights tech’s vital role in fixed income pricing
MarketAxess’ Julien Alexandre discusses how cutting-edge technology is transforming pricing and execution in the fixed income market amid periodic bouts of volatility
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
This Week: Trading Technologies completes ANS deal; State Street; Equinix; and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Interactive Brokers looks beyond US borders for growth opportunities
As retail trading has grown in volume and importance, Interactive Brokers and others are expanding international offerings and marketing abroad.
JP Morgan’s goal of STP in loans materializes on Versana’s platform
The accomplishment highlights the budding digitization of private credit, though it’s still a long road ahead.
As data volumes explode, expect more outages
Waters Wrap: At least for those unprepared—though preparation is no easy task—says Anthony.