October 2015: Tamper at Your Peril
In our industry, mergers and acquisitions are a fact of life. They’re a sign that the industry is maturing, and that entities—be they capital markets firms or third-party technology vendors who serve them—have created something of value that someone else wants.
More than a decade ago, I remember sitting down with Gavin Lavelle, CEO of SunGard’s Panorama business unit at the time, where we attempted to establish the number of technology firms SunGard had acquired since its founding back in 1983 when it was spun off from the Sun Oil Company. We lost count somewhere between 150 and 160, illustrating the extent to which the firm had already grown through acquisition. Clearly, SunGard is an extreme example, but it does illustrate the extent to which M&A activity has shaped, and will continue to shape, our industry.
However, mergers and acquisitions tend to be troublesome beasts. They are often badly handled affairs that in many instances yield divisiveness and an “us and them” culture as opposed to one of unity and co-operation. While pretty much all M&A plans appear simple to execute when they are hatched, when it comes to bedding down one culture—along with its history, idiosyncrasies and objectives—within another, things can go pear-shaped pretty quickly.
As Investit’s Catherine Doherty explains in David Dawkins’ M&A feature on page 16, there exists a temptation to “fiddle” with an organization once it has been subsumed by a larger entity, an itch that clearly large numbers of technology firms cannot resist scratching. This fiddling might entail repositioning or rebranding products, or it might involve replacing key staff members who appear to be surplus to requirements. It might even involve something as drastic as mothballing existing offerings and migrating clients to alternative platforms.
Whatever the case, fiddling invariably leads to diluting the acquired firm’s secret sauce, which often proves debilitating, if not terminal. In most instances, fiddling tends not to be good for anyone—the acquirer, the acquiree, and especially their clients.
So what’s the answer? In short, acquirers should keep their fiddling to a minimum. Ideally, products and their owners should be left to operate in pretty much the same environment as they were used to, where they can adhere to their research and development schedules and client-interfacing activities that had served them so well over the years. Naturally, there will be synergies between the two firms and those need to be acknowledged, but in most instances, the rule of thumb is thus: If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
BMO’s cloud migration strategy eases AI adoption
The Canadian bank is embracing a more digital future as its cloud strategy makes gains and it looks to both traditional machine learning and generative AI for further augmentation.
Waters Wrap: GenAI and rising tides
As banks, asset managers, and vendors ratchet up generative AI experiments and rollouts, Anthony explains why collaboration between business and tech teams is crucial.
Ice moves to meet demand for greater cloud, AI capabilities
The exchange also outlined competitive advantages behind managing its data and cloud strategy internally during its Q1 earnings call on Thursday.
FactSet looks to build on portfolio commentary with AI
Its new solution will allow users to write attribution summaries more quickly and adds to its goal of further accelerating discoverability, automation, and innovation.
How Ally found the key to GenAI at the bottom of a teacup
Risk-and-tech chemistry—plus Microsoft’s flexibility—has seen the US lender leap from experiments to execution.
The IMD Wrap: Beginning of the end for data audits?
This week, there’s exciting news for data bean-counters in the form of a partnership between two vendors that could change the way we view and track data usage and audits.
S&P debuts Spark Assist genAI copilot, draws up ‘Blueprints’ of combined datasets
S&P’s Kensho subsidiary has rolled out new emerging tech products leveraging AI to explore and combine the vendor’s wealth of datasets to solve common use cases.
Most read
- Northern Trust building internal cloud data ‘marketplace’
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- Northern Trust: Improving transparency across the asset servicing market