How Many Utilities Does the Industry Need?

nicholas-hamilton

What started as enthusiastic talk within the reference data industry about the benefits of utilities is increasingly being put into practice, with the announcement this month that Swift is working with a group of large banks on a utility for know-your-customer (KYC) data.

When it is launched in December, Swift's KYC Registry will join a growing list of reference data utilities—at the end of 2012, Euroclear and SmartStream teamed up to create their Central Data Utility; GoldenSource has also partnered with IBM to create the Global Data Utility; and the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is working with a group of banks on a client reference data utility.

There are good reasons for this scramble to establish utilities, the most obvious of which is cost reduction. At a time when financial firms are trying to make the most of reduced budgets, utilities create the potential for significant savings because service providers perform a common data management task only once and share the results with a group of users, rather than doing the same work separately for each user.

Utilities can also lead to greater standardization—because a larger number of users will be sourcing the same data from a common source—and improved levels of data quality, because this group of users will be available to provide feedback on the same data.

However, these benefits only become significant if a utility attracts a large number of users. If it secures only a handful of users, the hoped-for economies of scale and competitive pricing will not materialize, and there will be less of an impact on data quality.

As more utilities become available in the reference data space, the benefits of each solution are likely to be reduced. This is because the market will be spread out thinly across a wide range of utilities, each of which will find it harder to secure a critical mass of users.

As vendors look for new operating models, questions have to be asked about how many utilities the industry really needs. It will be interesting to see, in the coming month, how vendors differentiate their utility offerings and which of these rises to the top.

For more on this topic, see this feature and this video interview with Euroclear's Martijn Groot.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

The AI boom proves a boon for chief data officers

Voice of the CDO: As trading firms incorporate AI and large language models into their investment workflows, there’s a growing realization among firms that their data governance structures are riddled with holes. Enter the chief data officer.

If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?

Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here