European Commission Adopts ISIN and RTS 23 Under MiFID II
The commission's decision to keep the ISIN identifier standard reaps criticism from industry professionals
The European Commission has adopted several technical standards of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), including RTS 23 (Regulatory Technical Standard), which deals with standards and formats for financial instrument reference data.
The commission is in the process of finalizing level two texts of the regulation.
The initial version of the standards mandated the International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) for reporting under MiFID II, prompting some controversy. This mandate has been retained.
Some industry participants have stated the position that the ISIN is not fit for the purpose of reporting all financial instruments. The Open Symbology Group at data giant Bloomberg has developed what it says is an alternative, the non-proprietary Financial Instrument Global Identifier (FIGI).
Richard Young, head of regulatory and industry relations at the Open Symbology Group, says in a statement: "As we and industry bodies such as the International Swaps and Derivatives Association and Global Financial Markets Association have stressed before, the decision to mandate ISIN as the sole instrument identifier for MiFID II is unworkable as currently proposed. We are concerned that the technical limitations in the ISIN standard, and the governance and transparency issues surrounding the issuance of ISINs will pose substantial challenges for market participants.
"As a result of all these concerns, we recommend to authorize the use of other standards in addition to the ISIN. However, the statement of the European Commission in the adopted RTS fails to recognize that there are alternative, appropriate and proven standards, such as FIGI, which is a free, open source standard subject to well-established governance rules."
David Nowell, head of regulatory compliance and industry relations, UnaVista, London Stock Exchange (LSE) Group, welcomes the development.
"London Stock Exchange welcomes the European Commission's proposals to adopt the ISIN as the instrument identifier under MiFID II. The use of the ISIN and its accompanying Classification of Financial Instruments (CFI) code allows regulators to have both an identifier and associated instrument classification data," says Nowell.
The LSE Group has been involved in industry efforts to develop the ISIN for over-the-counter derivatives reporting. One proposed approach is to combine the ISIN with the CFI for more granular identification of an instrument.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project