London Stock Exchange-Deutsche Börse Merger Suffers Potentially Terminal Setback
LSEG refuses European Commission’s antitrust demand to sell stake in Italian platform MTS, placing proposed merger in jeopardy.
![lse1 lse1](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/646/132646/lse1-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=y0HLmeUQ)
In a statement released on February 26, LSEG said it “could not commit” to a divestment of MTS, a regulated electronic trading platform for European wholesale government bonds and other fixed-income securities.
The European Commission had made the divestment recommendation in mid-February in conjunction with a previous requirement that LSEG sell its stake in French clearing house LCH SA. A deal to sell LCH SA to European exchange rival Euronext was announced in January this year.
“The LSEG board believes that it is highly unlikely that a sale of MTS could be satisfactorily achieved, even if LSEG were to give the commitment,” said LSEG’s statement. “Moreover, the LSEG board believes the offer of such a remedy would jeopardize LSEG’s critically important relationships with these regulators and be detrimental to LSEG’s ongoing businesses in Italy and the combined group, were the merger to complete.”
LSEG has said that it will not propose a remedy to the European Commission’s demand and therefore “believes that the Commission is unlikely to provide clearance for the merger” with Deutsche Börse, but will continue its efforts to implement the deal.
A combined LSEG-Deutsche Börse entity would possess the clout to rival international exchange rivals such as Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and CME Group in the US, but has met with continued resistance from European regulators and competitors, fearing the creation of a European exchange monopoly. The UK’s decision to leave the European Union also created tension between the two exchanges as to where the combined group’s headquarters would be located.
By rejecting the European Commission’s antitrust demand, LSEG looks to have walked away from the proposed merger, despite insisting that it would continue to look for ways to push ahead with the merger and remains convinced of its “strategic benefits.”
However, LSEG was also bullish on its own prospects should the merger collapse, saying in the statement that it is “highly confident in the strength of LSEG’s business, strategy and prospects on a standalone basis” and expects to report “strong progress across all business areas” within its preliminary year end results on March 3.
Should LSEG officially withdraw its interest in the merger, the path may be open for non-European rivals to make an approach for either group; in March last year, a statement from ICE announced the possibility of a counter bid for LSEG, although no formal offer was made.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
Natixis refines in-house interoperability model
The French asset manager has refined its canonical data model over the last decade, as the interoperability movement continues to evolve.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
IEX Cloud closure forces fintech clients to seek data alternatives
IEX says it is ditching its unprofitable data arm to focus on its core exchange business, but other vendors believe they can turn a profit from its former client base of fintechs, retail investors and some institutions.
This week: Nasdaq/IDX, IMC/Cboe, S&P, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?