T-Minus One Year: It’s Now or Never on Mifid II

John hopes that preparations for the incoming regulation are top of the New Year’s resolutions pile for asset managers.

jan-new-year

January is paradoxically the most optimistic and bleakest time of the year for some; while the cold, dark days are a far cry from the festive cheer just passed, it's also a time to make changes for the better, to be more than we have been in the past.

As such, it's rather fitting that Mifid II will finally be implemented on January 3 next year. While regulatory compliance isn't exactly optional, the industry has now reached its tipping point. For those firms that have yet to start work on implementing necessary systems or putting adequate policies in place, it's surely now or never.

Now you may be thinking, "Haven't we been here before though, John?" and you'd be right. Back at the start of September last year I said that the time for talking was over and that action was now required, despite the lingering vagaries around some key elements of the regulation.

And of course it's not as if each section of the regulation comes into force at the same time on January 3, 2018, with various parts spread out either over the course of this year or after next year's go-live date.

Generally speaking, there's no real reason for firms not be fully compliant by this time next year, especially when the year-long delay is taken into account. The question now is: How much longer will we be hearing that Mifid II preparations are either a top priority for asset managers, or, failing that, what the excuses for non-compliance in 2018 may be.

The MAR Test

My colleague, Aggelos Andreou, this week wrote about the buy-side's reaction to the implementation of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) in July last year, which introduced stricter rules around surveillance, market manipulation and insider dealing.

While it seems that the majority of the buy side were able to get their house in order prior to the new rules coming in, some took advantage of a more lenient approach by regulators to earn a period of grace. I'm sure that by now we've all heard similar stories of planned procrastination within certain sections of the market concerning Mifid II readiness, with some participants either hoping to be overlooked or simply preferring to take a fine instead of the arduous work required.

Whatever happens in January next year, much still needs to be done. While MAR can show some indications of the readiness of the buy side for complicated new regulation, Mifid II is an entirely different beast with many more tentacles to untangle. Will a year be long enough for those laggards that have so far dragged their heels? My feeling is that no, it really isn't.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

FCA declines to directly regulate market data prices

A year-long investigation by the UK regulator to determine whether competition is hindered in the wholesale data markets has concluded with its decision not to directly regulate much-maligned data pricing and licensing structures.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here