Spreadsheets Still Rule, But for How Long?

anthony-malakian-waters
Anthony Malakian, US Editor, WatersTechnology

It's a common refrain that I've heard in many different ways, and at many different times, to describe many different things: We need to automate and move away from our dependence on spreadsheets.

Even with this common battle cry, though, walk through the halls of most any asset manager and you will see a portfolio manager, trader, risk officer or compliance officer scanning through a spreadsheet, and more than likely it will be a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.

There have been tremendous advancements when it comes to data aggregation techniques and reporting capabilities in recent years. Cloud and hosted solutions populate the market for order management and compliance-related systems alike. Even still, there's a comfort level that spreadsheets enjoy and undeniably, spreadsheets are very, very cheap to manage. Sure, they can be a bit of a pain, but in familiarity there's comfort.

I would've thought that after 2008 there would be a true sea change toward automation. And to an extent, there has been a shift with added investment in end-to-end automated platforms. Gary Brackenridge, who head's Linedata's hedge funds business, says that this can prove a long and slow-to-develop process at large buy-side institutions.

While the largest firms are trying to untangle systems already in place, startup hedge funds and asset managers are relying on familiarity and cost cutting wherever possible. Two different explanations explain the same behavior.

Most startups have only a few people on staff and it's relatively easy to monitor the firm's risk and positions through a spreadsheet. The key is in knowing when to move to an automated solution as the firm grows.

But Brackenridge does note one potentially new driving force in favor of automation: investors, themselves.

As investors become savvier about how a firm manages its risk and positions, they may be more forceful in demanding that the firm reduce or drop its reliance on spreadsheets entirely. While some may like to believe that regulators are the most effective agents of change, in reality money rules and investor dollars will prove a better cattle prod in this regard.

For the March issue of Waters I'll be looking at this topic in depth. If you have any insight, feel free to shoot me an email (anthony.malakian@incisivemedia.com) or give me a call 646-490-3973.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Back to basics: Taxonomies, lineage still stifle data efforts

Voice of the CDO: While data professionals are increasingly showing their value when it comes to analytics and AI adoption, their main job is still—crucially—getting a strong data foundation in place. That starts with taxonomies and lineage.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here